12/22/2007 21:55:10||Running CPU benchmarks
12/22/2007 21:55:10||Suspending computation - running CPU benchmarks
12/22/2007 21:55:41||Benchmark results:
12/22/2007 21:55:41|| Number of CPUs: 3
12/22/2007 21:55:41|| 1511 floating point MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU
12/22/2007 21:55:41|| 3150 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU
12/22/2007 21:55:42||Resuming computation

---

6238 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU
2443 floating point MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU
Number of CPUs: 4

Processor: 1 GenuineIntel Intel(R) Pentium(R) Dual CPU T2310 @ 1.46GHz [Family 6 Model 15 Stepping 13]

Linux 2.6

Benchmark results:
Number of CPUs: 1
731 floating point MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU
3330 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU

Processor: 1 AuthenticAMD AMD Athlon(tm) 64 Processor 3000+ [x86 Family 15 Model 47 Stepping 2]

Windows XP Home Edition

Benchmark results:

Number of CPUs: 1

1660 floating point MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU

3055 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU

12/22/2007 21:55:10||Running CPU benchmarks
12/22/2007 21:55:10||Suspending computation - running CPU benchmarks
12/22/2007 21:55:41||Benchmark results:
12/22/2007 21:55:41|| Number of CPUs: 3
12/22/2007 21:55:41|| 1511 floating point MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU
12/22/2007 21:55:41|| 3150 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU
12/22/2007 21:55:42||Resuming computation

How do you get 3 cpu\'s? I\'ve heard of Single, Dual & Quode core cpu\'s. But I have never heard of a pc with 3 cpu\'s. Tanks in advance

Say, xPod... There must be something wrong with the way BOINCstats calculates percentages... If you\'re #1, shouldn\'t you be 100%?

---

Click here to see My Detailed BOINC Stats

Say, xPod... There must be something wrong with the way BOINCstats calculates percentages... If you\'re #1, shouldn\'t you be 100%?

Ah, but has he got more credit than himself? ;)

That\'s assuming that the rank percentage is based on the user\'s rank vs. the total number of users, which would make sense. He would also be 100%, if the rank was comparing the user\'s total credit vs. the top user. But, I guess it\'s neither of these.

---

Click here to see My Detailed BOINC Stats

BOINCStats is keeping track of 3863 users, and it\'s saying that xPOD is ABOVE 3862 of them (tied with self, as Janus said). 3862/3863 = 99.974%

If he\'s above 3862 of them, then he is #3863. 3863/3863 = 1.

---

Click here to see My Detailed BOINC Stats

If he\'s above 3862 of them, then he is #3863. 3863/3863 = 1.

Oh he\'s definitely #1. I think BOINCStats\' scoring is done like a percentile rank where it\'s calculated by the number of scores below yours. In other words, it\'s saying he did better than 99.974% of us. He couldn\'t do better than 100%, because then he\'d be doing better than himself. You\'re from the US -- it\'s the same way the SATs are scored.

It\'s kinda arbitrary though -- this way, the lowest person can (and does) have a score of zero. If the calculation was done the other way, using percentage of people EQUAL TO or below you, then xPOD would indeed have 100%, but the bottom guy would have a higher score than zero. *shrug*

Oh, and to keep this on-topic, here\'s a benchmark for my misbehaving machine:

Proc: Intel T2500 @ 2.00 GHz (x86 Family 6 Model 14 Stepping 8, fpu tsc sse sse2 mmx)
RAM: 1014.98 MB physical / 2.39 GB virtual
CPUs: 2
Whet: 1848 fp MIPS / CPU
Dhry: 3806 int MIPS / CPU

squeezed a few more integer MIPS out of one of the big boxes :)

1/8/2008 9:21:42 AM||Running CPU benchmarks
1/8/2008 9:22:13 AM||Benchmark results:
1/8/2008 9:22:13 AM|| Number of CPUs: 16
1/8/2008 9:22:13 AM|| 2783 floating point MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU
1/8/2008 9:22:13 AM|| 9053 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU
1/8/2008 9:22:14 AM||Resuming computation

---

wow, upgraded CPU\'s in a new box...

1/10/2008 1:45:58 PM||Benchmark results:
1/10/2008 1:45:58 PM|| Number of CPUs: 8
1/10/2008 1:45:58 PM|| 3064 floating point MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU
1/10/2008 1:45:58 PM|| 9316 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU

---

This is the results for my new Gateway GT5000 ( a great buy for $950)
Number of CPUs: 4
2265 floating point MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU
5096 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU

---

Started crunching yesterday,

Athlon 64 X2 @ 3.0 GHz

2734 floating point MIPS
6599 integer MIPS

Core 2 duo e8400 * 3.6Ghz

Benchmark results:
Number of CPUs: 2
3769 floating point MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU
7835 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU

BOINc 5.10.30

16-May-2008 17:31:16 [---] Benchmark results:
16-May-2008 17:31:16 [---] Number of CPUs: 8
16-May-2008 17:31:16 [---] 1849 floating point MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU
16-May-2008 17:31:16 [---] 7930 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU
16-May-2008 17:31:17 [---] Resuming computation

---

blog with my renders :- http://blog.global6.net/julesd/
website for radio :- www.global6.net
Hear me play on wednesdays between 20:00 and 22:00 Uk Time

GenuineIntel
Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Quad CPU Q6600 @ 2.40GHz
Measured floating point speed 2313.35 million ops/sec
Measured integer speed 9722.45 million ops/sec

ps3grid.net went for Cuda support on a pre release of Boinc 6.3.10 on August 26th. Around the same time I\'ve upgraded my GPU to a GTX 280.

The pre release client does not benchmark GPUs yet. Many boinc projects were contemplating Cuda support but ps3grid was the first.

That gave me a jump of 10k RAC per day, due to the card\'s theoretical benchmark close to 1 TFLOP from its 240 cores.

Now I feel I have a chance competing against Mr. xPod. If I get 3 way SLI :P

Something tells me you won\'t be able to beat a guy who works at Intel... He\'ll just switch on a couple hundred more machines and leave another million points in front of you.

---

Click here to see My Detailed BOINC Stats

Something tells me you won\'t be able to beat a guy who works at Intel... He\'ll just switch on a couple hundred more machines and leave another million points in front of you.

LOL

what a bummer, my big server bellied up the other day... so I need to rebuild the server... catch up, hurry! ;)

---